Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 12,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
California, 509 U.S. 764, 794-99, 113 S.Ct. 2891, 125 L.Ed.2d 612 (1993). [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:46 am
Cyrus Mehta on The Insightful Immigration Blog ("California’s New Laws Protecting the Rights of Immigrants Are Civil Rights and Should Never Be Found To Be Unconstitutional") analyzes the lawsuit in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:58 am
On October 5, 2011, United States District Court – Central District Judge Cormac J. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm
Back in January, we warned about what happened today: the United States Supreme Court has okayed police pulling people over to search their vehicles based upon an anonymous tip in the case of Navarette v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
" We will continue to monitor the case for a perhaps inevitable fight with the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 12:05 am
Yesterday in State of California v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 7:20 am
A recent Illinois case of United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 8:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 2:55 pm
United States, the Ninth Circuit en banc struck down California's ban on privately-run immigrant detention centers. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 6:49 pm
State of California, et al. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 12:15 am
JCCrandall, LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
He is a United Kingdom citizen and non- immigrant alien, living in the United States pursuant to a valid E-2 Visa, who at all relevant times has been residing in Sonoma, California. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:35 pm
NCIS, No. 3:10-cv-01879-WQH-MDD, in the United States District Court for the Sourthern District of California. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am
The recent Supreme Court term resulted in a number of very important decisions that will impact companies engaging in advertising and marketing in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 4:24 pm
In State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm
SWRCB adopted the Procedures in April 2019 to supplement state-perceived gaps in federal Clean Water Act regulation for proposed discharges of dredged or fill material to broadly defined “waters of the state,” including all wetlands within California – not just wetlands considered “Waters of the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
No Density Bonus for this Coastal Project In Kalnel Gardens, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
No Density Bonus for this Coastal Project In Kalnel Gardens, LLC v. [read post]
