Search for: "State of Ga. v. Davis" Results 241 - 260 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term Commencing March 4, 1877 1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am by Pace Law Library
State controls within a federal greenhouse gas cap-and-trade program. 28 Va. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:48 am by Lisa Meller and Sophie Davis
A more recent example is Seadrill Ghana Operations Ltd v Tullow Ghana Ltd (2018) where the court stated that when considering reasonable steps to mitigate, a party should consider the interests of both contracting parties and not just its own. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am by Benjamin Bissell
Although the sides agree on the price for Russian gas, the amount to be bought, and the repayment by Kiev of unpaid bills, Moscow is demanding more assurances that Kiev can produce $1.6 billion “up front” for gas deliveries. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
In addition, each state has a national guard commanded by the state's governor and coordinated by the National Guard Bureau. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:04 am
In several states, incidences of violence in the past year have prompted new laws or solidified rules allowing judges to bring guns into courtrooms. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
In a strongly worded order issued last week, a district judge overturned a 2008 state ruling that granted the authority permission to tap groundwater from three valleys in central Lincoln County. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm by admin
Ga. 2001) (“epidemiology is the medical science devoted to determining the cause of disease in human beings”). [4] See, e.g., Lopez v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]