Search for: "State of Maine v. Adams"
Results 241 - 260
of 433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm
Jones v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:30 am
Rather, it is the unavoidable result of the creation of a market because a market cannot exist without the promise of reward to owners of property who choose to place that property on the market.6 More recently, the Supreme Court has explicitly rejected this erroneous secondary consideration reasoning, reiterating the basic economic logic of copyright in Eldred v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
See Apple Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
He held that “restraints on immorality are the main safeguards of society against influences which might be fatal to it. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 8:45 am
UPDATE: Adam Liptak of the New York Times has an interesting article discussing Neily’s book and other recent contributions to t [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:43 am
Motorola would most likely be a paying licensee by now, too, if not for Google's adamant position that Android is "free" -- which no one in the industry believes anymore. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
(Eugene Volokh) I just returned last night from Indianapolis, where I had the honor and pleasure of arguing on behalf of amici in State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 4:05 am
Marshall. 65 Maine Law Review 755-788 (2013).New Books:Matt Apuzzo & Adam Goldman, Enemies Within: Inside the NYPD's Secret Spying Unit and Bin Laden's Final Plot against America, (Touchstone, Sept. 3, 2013), reviewed by Rolling Stone.Thomas E. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm
Bingham of Ohio and the Historical Context of the Fourteenth Amendment" Cynthia Nicoletti (Assistant Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law) "The Disputed Constitutionality of the Emancipation Proclamation"11:00-12:30 | Panel TwoStephen Mihm (University of Georgia), chairPaul Kens (Professor of Political Science, Texas State University at San Marcos) "Big Business and the Reconstruction Amendments: Lessons from Munn v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm
Phelps, the funeral-protest case, and United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
pid=5070661§ion=main&fm=Product.AddToCart 2013© by the American Bar Association. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:51 am
See Casto v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am
Sharp and the Supreme Court’s 1967 opinion in Loving v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
For example, the Military Commissions Act of 2009,1 which completely overhauled the Guantánamo Bay military commissions, was passed as Title XVIII of the 2010 NDAA.2 Likewise, the 2011–2013 NDAAs’ detention provisions—the main subject of this book—generated far more controversy and attention than the surrounding thousands of pages of appropriations provisions. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
In his critical investigation into the administration of law in Canada Adam Dodeck differentiates public lawyers from those practicing in private sectors. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
In his critical investigation into the administration of law in Canada Adam Dodeck differentiates public lawyers from those practicing in private sectors. [read post]
