Search for: "State of Maryland v. Thomas" Results 241 - 260 of 780
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2019, 9:49 am by Amy Howe
Chief Justice Roberts announces opinion in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:13 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In a separate concurrence, Thomas also reiterated his longtime argument that the Establishment Clause should not apply to local and state governments; in other words, states and cities should be able to establish religion as they see fit.Now that Lemon is history, we are left to ask what is next. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:07 am by Andree Blumstein
Andrée Sophia Blumstein is the solicitor general of Tennessee, which joined 29 other states in an amicus brief in support of the constitutionality of the cross in The American Legion v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:27 am by Michael Stokes Paulsen
Thomas concurred in the judgment only, reiterating his long-held idiosyncratic (but defensible) view that the establishment clause does not apply to the states. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
DiNapoli, Office of New York State Comptroller, on Sunday, June 16, 2019 Tags: Climate change, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, New York, Pension funds, Stewardship, Sustainability Mootness Fees Posted by Steven Davidoff Solomon (University of California, Berkeley), on Monday, June 17, 2019 Tags: Class actions, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fairness review, Merger litigation, Mergers… [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
The cross is owned and maintained by the State of Maryland. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm by Mark Walsh
He quickly summarizes how the state agency, the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, acquired the cross and the land on which it sits, to help preserve it and to address traffic safety concerns around its busy site. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 12:44 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 Justices Thomas and Gorsuch also wrote opinions concurring in the judgment, suggesting the case should not have been heard, either because the plaintiffs lacked standing (Gorsuch, joined by Thomas) or because the Establishment Clause shouldn't apply to the states or to monuments (Thomas). [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
That is the so-called “Lemon test,” taking its name from the decision in the case of Lemon v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
” Justice Clarence Thomas also would have allowed the cross to stand, but for a different reason: He believes that the Constitution’s establishment clause does not apply to the states at all. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch concurred in the judgement, each writing separately. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:39 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Conspiracy to distribute heroin Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Harford County, Jessie Thomas Alimondo, appellant, was convicted of conspiracy to distribute heroin. [read post]