Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court" Results 241 - 260 of 1,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2015, 7:44 am by Howard Friedman
 The court found no state action.In Farfan v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 10:10 pm by Ben Vernia
On August 28, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, in US ex rel Newell v City of St Paul affirmed the district court’s dismissal under the public disclosure bar. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:15 pm by EEM
News:The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a unanimous ruling in the case of State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is an issue of first impression for the Eighth Circuit, an issue that several district courts have confronted, but only one other circuit court, the Eleventh Circuit (Tapscott v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:00 am by Nathaniel Grow
District Court for the Northern District of California, and one in the District for Minnesota. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
A Minnesota federal district court yesterday refused to issue a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction to allow the Tarek ibn Ziyad Acedmy to continue to operate after the July 1 expiration of the contract with its current sponsor. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
  The plaintiff, an Illinois resident, filed the complaint in March 2012, in Minnesota state court. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 7:17 am
District Court, District of Minnesota (Rosenbaum, J.), repeatedly. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm by Daniel Barry
On January 2, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (“Tenth Circuit”) denied the State of Oklahoma’s motion for a stay pending appeal to the United States Supreme Court and one week later transferred jurisdiction back to the district court[1] regarding Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:23 am by Meg Martin
The issue decided by the Minnesota district court was identical to the issue presented to the Wyoming district court. [read post]