Search for: "State of Oregon v. Long" Results 241 - 260 of 979
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2016, 6:48 am
This post examines an opinion from the Oregon Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:49 am by SHG
This has long been the way to rhetorically circumvent the obvious. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 2:36 pm
Better than on the field of battle, I'd think.Trilink Saw Chain, LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am by Russ Bensing
  Only two states allow this, Louisiana and Oregon, and forty years ago, in Apodaca v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm by NARF
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974)United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 5:12 pm
I envision them ruling that a state court is free to rely on an independent state law ground for avoiding the constitutional issue in this case, so long as there is no indication that the court came to the independent state law determination in bad faith.Justice Breyer: He said he initially viewed the Oregon Supreme Court's decision as a "run around," but now he isn't so sure. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:33 pm by Keith Rizzardi
 There was a time when bull trout, like most salmonids, were wildly abundant in the six western states of Oregon, Washington, California, Nevada, Idaho and Montana. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:48 pm by Lawrence Taylor
Supreme Court case that upheld sobriety checkpoints (Michigan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 3:26 pm
Nor do the Rigsbys proffer any newly discovered evidence, focusing instead on known events that occurred long before disqualified Counsel filed their two opposition briefs to State Farm’s disqualification motion. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 3:26 pm
Nor do the Rigsbys proffer any newly discovered evidence, focusing instead on known events that occurred long before disqualified Counsel filed their two opposition briefs to State Farm’s disqualification motion. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:19 am by Lyle Denniston
The state courts had relied on a 1963 Supreme Court decision, in the case of Sherbert v. [read post]