Search for: "State of Texas v. EPA" Results 241 - 260 of 418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm by John Elwood
Texas (Ysleta I) correctly subjects the Pueblo to all Texas gaming regulations. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm by WIMS
"     Also included, Texas State Representative Garnet Coleman (D) said, "I want to thank President Obama and his administration for listening and working with state and local governments. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:58 am by WIMS
Michigan News <> Attorney General v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:31 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:25 am by Jonathan H. Adler
EPA, concerning the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate greenhouse gases from power plants under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, and Biden v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 11:48 am by Amy Howe
EPA (Oct. 16) – Whether the limitations in the permit issued to San Francisco for its discharges of wastewater into the Pacific Ocean violate the Clean Water Act The November argument schedule Wisconsin Bell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Kali Borkoski
 These grants are in addition to Friday’s orders (which Lyle covered last week), in which the Court agreed to review the constitutionality of three redistricting plans drawn up by a federal court for the Texas legislature and the state’s delegation to the U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
In West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]