Search for: "State v James Stewart"
Results 241 - 260
of 297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2011, 9:52 am
The official, James Stewart, claimed that the state had essentially sued itself, because a state plaintiff had sued a state defendant. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 10:36 am
For publication opinions today (2): James Stewart v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:13 pm
James Whitman 14. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:37 pm
Funders of JumpStart America's initial work include the John S. and James L. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:24 am
Warren, you’ll be over by me instead… “But… I was Chief Economist… ” I know you were, Simon, but I’ve got you sitting with James Kwak… “Oh come on… I’m always stuck sitting with him… this is so not fair…” Look, Simon… stage a quiet coup, would you please? [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:14 am
In the Matter of Buencamino v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:28 pm
Stewart v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:03 pm
James V. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:52 am
The final Kagan-related story comes from David Savage and James Oliphant in the L.A. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Harlan II and Potter Stewart (appointed by Eisenhower), Lewis F. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:55 pm
” Kenneth Allen Stewart v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:03 pm
Political scientists James Fowler, Timothy Johnson, James Spriggs, Sangic Jeon, and Paul Wahlbeck published a compelling study measuring the legal importance of Supreme Court opinions using network analysis. 6. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:04 am
Columbia Law prof James Liebman contributes an essay to SCOTUS Blog's appreciation of Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
Below is an essay for our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens by James Liebman, the Simon H. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
