Search for: "State v. Aguilar" Results 241 - 260 of 282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2022, 5:24 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Gómez, Gilberto Guerrero-Rocca, Nicolás Vassallo, María Gabriela De Abreu Negrón, Karen Longaric, & Fabián Villeda Corona, Revisión de laudos arbitrales de inversión 2020: 2º Encuentro Anual (Santiago de Chile, 07-08/06/2021) Lucas Carlos Lima, As medidas cautelares da Corte Internacional de Justiça no caso Ucrânia e Federação Russa Eshan Dauhoo, The Challenges faced by Women Legal Academics (Panel Discussion) … [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Cadbury Adams USA LLC (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) State Tort claim preempted by patent claim where pleading of bad faith did not meet Iqbal standards: Viskase Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Without equivocation, Commissioner Aguilar stated that cyber security was a board responsibility. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
Federal preemption of state tort claims BIC Pen Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
Aguilar, 13-677, a case in which California sought to reverse the Ninth Circuit’s determination that Brady v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Straw, although “stunned,” did not state there was no settlement. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Straw, although “stunned,” did not state there was no settlement. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am by Aaron Pelley
Byrd: The Court overruled its recent decision in State v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:00 am
The study, mandated by Congress following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:02 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
New York, NY: The Foundation for a Civil Society.Barahona de Brito, Alexandra, Carmen González-Enríquez, and Paloma Aguilar, eds. 2001. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]