Search for: "State v. B. Rose" Results 241 - 260 of 636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am by Jon Gelman
(b) When read in context, the phrase “an Exchange established by the State under [42 U. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:26 am
NFP criminal opinions today (8): In State of Indiana v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d at 65) Because SAi claims that “[b]ut for Furgang’s2 departure from the ordinary standards of professional conduct, SAi would … have [saved] more than $300,000 in legal fees”, SAi states that “‘but for’ [F&A’s] negligence[,] [SAi] … would not have sustained ‘actual and ascertainable’ damages. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am by CMS
Lord Hodge who gave the only judgment (with which Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows and Lady Rose agreed) stated (at [33]): “.. the purpose of section 471(3) is to circumvent the difficult issues that can arise in the application of section 471(1). [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:29 am by Ronald Mann
On Wednesday morning, the Justices started with what might seem to be a minor tax case, United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 1:38 am
Grant, JudgeRepresenting Appellants (Defendants): Peter B. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Proskauer Rose Blog-Proud Loud and Proud right on the home page. [read post]