Search for: "State v. Bingham"
Results 241 - 260
of 392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm
R(Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice presented the UK Supreme Court with the question of whether compensation for miscarriage of justice should only be payable to someone was subsequently shown conclusively to have been innocent of the offence, or whether it should be open to anyone whose conviction has been declared unsafe. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
The Status of Religious Arbitration in the United States and Canada Nicholas Walter Abstract: This paper discusses, and challenges, the status of religious arbitration in the United States and Canada. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 10:54 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:04 am
While Staten v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am
” And as Lord Bingham went on to note in R (on the application of Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary, the essence of breach of the peace in Howell “was to be found in violence or threatened violence”. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:59 am
On April 8, 2011, in the case of Bingham v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:11 am
In T M Noten BV v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 11:10 am
” (See Serrano v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:41 am
First, Bingham never referred to Justice Bushrod Washington’s discussion of fundamental rights in Corfield v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 11:01 pm
Ahmed & Anor v R [2011] EWCA Crim 184 (25 February 2011) – Read judgment “Torture is wrong”. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:01 am
Moreover, the Supreme Court in the case of De Rossa v Independent Newspapers endorsed the view that juries should not be given guidelines on damages by judges. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
In proceedings by prisoners subsequently heard in Scotland (Smith v Scott [2007] SC 345), Northern Ireland (R v Secretary of State ex parte Toner and Walsh [1997] NIQB 18) and in England and Wales (Chester v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWCA Civ 1439) the relevant Secretary of State has expressly accepted that the ban on prisoner voting is incompatible with the ECHR. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:52 am
The leading case on the issue is the House of Lords judgment in the 2004 case of R v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:00 am
Austin v- Metropolitan Police Commissioner was brought by a demonstrator who attended anti-capitalist protests in London in 2001. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:52 am
Kasprzak v Warsaw Regional Court, Poland; Bingham v Trial Court No 4 of Marbella, Spain; Wilson-Campbell v Court of Instruction No 4 of Orihuela, Alicante, Spain [2011] EWHC 100 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 35 “Article 23 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between member states, as implemented by s 36(3)(b) of the Extradition Act 2003, contemplated the possibility of agreement… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm
TTM (By his Litigation Friend TM) v London Borough of Hackney, East London NHS Foundation Trust; Secretary of State for Health – Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that the local authority, but not the detaining hospital, was liable to pay compensation to a person who had been unlawfully detained under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983. [read post]
