Search for: "State v. Blight" Results 241 - 260 of 370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Of states reporting personal property tax data, state reliance on personal property in 2017 ranged from 1.79 percent to about 29 percent of state property tax bases. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:27 pm
The fact that the public might benefit indirectly from the new private use (because, for example, it helps remedy a blighted area) does not make the “use” one by the public. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
California Outdoor Equity Partners, LLC v City of Los Angeles, 2015 WL 7259731 (CD CA. 11/16/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Equal Protection, Signs [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am by John Elwood
” But the courts upheld it in part on the ground that it was legitimate to take the property to “prevent future blight,” and also to promote economic development, which the Supreme Court recognized as a legitimate public purpose in the controversial decision Kelo v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
So you went to law school right as a generation of legal thinkers was persuading people, bit by bit, that both judicial activism and restraint were misguided, and that courts can and must enforce constitutional limits on the state. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
The federal action was dismissed for failure to state a viable claim that the condemnations violated the Fifth Amendment (see Goldstein v Pataki, 488 F Supp2d 254 [EDNY 2007], affd 516 F3d 50 [2d Cir 2008]). [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm by Ilya Somin
Cornell Law School Dean and prominent property law scholar Eduardo Peñalver’s has posted a thoughtful review of my book The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]