Search for: "State v. Brett"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
A criminal prosecution is usually brought by the state. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
In The American Legion v American Humanist Association, 588 U. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 11:43 am
In “The Unfinished Story of Roe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 8:15 am
ShareJustice Brett Kavanaugh’s opinion for a unanimous court Thursday in Cantero v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:23 am
If they believe that the precedents they like—like Roe v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:38 pm
This isn't a post about Brett Kavanaugh, who was the recipient of this message, not its author. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
Toran v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:01 am
At Medium, Katy Naples-Mitchell urges the justices to review Johnson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:09 am
Briefly: At Law360 (subscription required), retired state-court judge George Eskin urges the justices to review Lacaze v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 6:29 pm
Gundy v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:54 pm
United States sharply divided the justices, with an odd lineup supporting Justice Neil Gorsuch’s opinion: Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Julie Burkhart warns that “[t]he confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court will lead to a decision to overturn or gut the essence of Roe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2020, 9:11 pm
JTH Tax, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:52 pm
Moore v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:33 am
The SCT, in Flowers v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:03 pm
But 5-4, if Brett and Amy hold firm. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 4:49 am
Lacking the mad skillz of Yale law students to know with absolute certainty that the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court means “people will die,” it seemed prudent to consider what Judge Kavanaugh had actually said or written in the past rather than to assume he would reverse Roe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm
Judge Brett Kavanaugh inquired about the United States’s reasons for seeking en banc review initially—a natural enough inquiry, given his authorship of the Hamdan II opinion now under review, along with Al-Bahlul’s conviction. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
Justice Brett M. [read post]
