Search for: "State v. C. N."
Results 241 - 260
of 6,427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) lcb11@psu.edu Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Regan v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:15 am
Second, apply the correct state law. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
In Re D [2008] 1 WLR 1499 at [27] Lord Carswell approved what had been said by Richards LJ in R (N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region) [2006] QB 468 at [62] who had said, ‘Although there is a single civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, it is flexible in its application. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:00 pm
También es citado bastante por Joaquín V. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 3:04 pm
Therefore, “[c]ourts generally favor [arbitration] provisions, and [ ] try to resolve ambiguity… in favor of arbitration. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The PCT application names the three inventors as inventors and as applicants for the United States of America (US) only. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am
At the hearing, the parties argued the import of the recent decision of State of Missouri v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Lucy C. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
On 6 October 2023, Collins Rice J handed down judgement defendant in the case of Corinna Zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn v His Majesty Juan Carlos Alfonso Victor Maria de Borbón y Borbón. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:39 pm
” Etc.In the 1969 case of Powell v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:46 pm
CLS Bank Int’l, 573 U.S. 208, 216 (2014) (quoting Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:51 am
State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:28 am
Likewise, the Minister of Health, César Vásquez, told TV Perú that ”there has been no negligence or carelessness on the part of the health sector, because there were doctors, 4 doctors. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
Einer Elhauge, has stated: “Dozens of empirical studies have now confirmed this economic reality that common shareholding alters corporate behavior. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Rev. 1863, 1873 & n.66 (2005). [8] The United States of America v. [read post]
