Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 241 - 260
of 13,651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm
IN THE NEWS President Joseph R. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
As one commenter stated: “In the hours and days following a cybersecurity breach, companies must quickly and efficiently contain, minimize, and remedy any damage or loss resultin [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Charles R. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In Counterman v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:00 pm
[3] State of Utah et al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the US Supreme Court’s decision in the Jack Daniel’s v VIP IP dispute. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
Decisions from the Federal Circuit Court can be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm
The application and reiteration of which was recently seen in Enka v Chubb and Kabab-ji v Kout Food Group. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:41 pm
Glass, R, Parashar, U.D., and Estes, M.K., “Norovirus Gastroenteritis,” NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, Vol. 361, No. 18, pp. 1776-1785 (Oct. 29, 2009). [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
R. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Smith might never get her website up and running, or that (b) same-sex couples would never actually request her services, or that (c) she would discourage—strongly—said couples, but not actually refuse them service. 1. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Eddington (Senior Fellow, Cato Institute)“Lessons Learned and Caveats for the Future: The January 6, 2021, Attempted Insurrection”Expert Statement Mary Anne Franks (Professor of Law and Michael R. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am
In Reilly v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am
In Reilly v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am
In Reilly v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
However, the traditional “surviving patent” approach according to Harnkatheterset is now under some scrutiny: A referral to the CJEU by Munich I Regional Court resulted in the decision C-44/21 Phoenix Contact v Harting, in which it was held that a “surviving patent only” approach is incompatible with the Enforcement Directive. [read post]
