Search for: "State v. Cass"
Results 241 - 260
of 335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2021, 8:48 am
v=8BDrhsHosIY. 4. [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:30 pm
First, I’m not sure that 3pp v. 2pp perfectly captures the “retributive v. consequentialist” divide. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:10 am
You don't have to articulate an administerable standard any more than you did in Bush v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:45 am
In an interview with The New York Times, Stevens talked about what he called a telling flaw in the opening sentence of the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 3:38 am
United StatesCox. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
Claude Monet, Turkeys Unfinished Decoration 1876 Musée D'OrsayThe object, then, is to try to rationalize an order to the quite dynamic states of norm-regulation construction in the many spaces that exist above, beyond or between states. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) US General – Decisions California state appeals court upholds Bank of America win in trade secret spat with K C Multimedia (Law360) US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Canon USA – Canon sues former employee for revealing trade secrets to rival Ikon Office Solutions in violation of confidentiality agreement (Law360) US Patent Reform Patent Reform Act of 2009 introduced in Senate and House… [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 1:48 pm
This is precisely what happened in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 11:37 pm
This is a view that has been endorsed by English judges in Lawlor (at para 3) and Aquavita International SA v Ashapura Minecham Ltd [2014] EWHC 2806 (Comm) [20], citing inter alia, older editions of Plender and Wilderpin. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:03 pm
Chris Peterson blogged on Monday about the Supreme Court's decision, in the Cuomo v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:49 pm
Cass and Hylton explain that IP protection, including copyright, comes with static costs, but it produces dynamic benefits. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
Judges and scholars found confusing, for example, the Court’s 2001 decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Rev. 56, 63–66 (2015) (suggesting after King v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:28 am
Famously stated by Cass Sunstein, the nondelegation doctrine “has had one good year…” Since 1935 when the Court was using the doctrine to strike down FDR’s New Deal programs, the Court has repeatedly upheld delegations so long as they are subject to a limiting “intelligible principle. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:31 am
In Perez v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:11 am
One of these cases reached the Supreme Court in 2012 in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Cass R. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:45 am
Rumsfeld v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 11:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
