Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 241 - 260
of 7,451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2009, 9:17 am
Washington, it actually applied the less demanding standard of United States v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:30 am
Joseph V. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:43 am
Manuel Noriega was indicted in the United States and sentenced there. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
Judge Milan Smith has a fairly good quote in this regard that's both accurate and worth repeating: "Even at a time when the largest law firms in the United States were composed of not many more than one hundred lawyers, Judge Friendly observed that we live in an 'age of increased specialization and high mobility of the bar.' Spanos v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:17 am
In the case of August Storck KG v OHIM, the CJEU saw that a mark can be registered under Article 7(3) (which has to be read in conjunction with Article 52 above) "…only if evidence is provided that it has acquired, in consequence of the use which has been made of it, distinctive character in the part of the [EU] in which it did not, ab initio, have such character". [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:17 am
In the case of August Storck KG v OHIM, the CJEU saw that a mark can be registered under Article 7(3) (which has to be read in conjunction with Article 52 above) "…only if evidence is provided that it has acquired, in consequence of the use which has been made of it, distinctive character in the part of the [EU] in which it did not, ab initio, have such character". [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:10 pm
As artfully stated in the recent decision of Reid v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
Electronic Arts Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Darren Patterson Christian Academy v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:00 pm
V. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:11 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
The case is United States of America v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V The contracting Parties shall not be bound to delivery up their own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this treaty. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
" The judge found the claims to be without merit, since the Fourth Circuit does not require unindicted co-conspirators to be named, no statement of facts is required, and the indictment stated the period of the conspiracy.Counsel erred in moving the original indictment into evidence. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in Sosa v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:00 am
United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 9:56 am
Miquel MontañáIn the past decade, a new character of the patent theatre has made inroads into the case law of some EU Member States, “imported” from the so-called “EPO case law”. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm
Golden v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Boz Export & Import, Inc. v. [read post]
