Search for: "State v. Christopher R."
Results 241 - 260
of 1,391
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:10 am
The referral, but unfortunately not the referred question, has now been answered by the CJEU with its order in Eli Lilly v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 1:00 pm
The second referral, Sandoz v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 1:53 am
Case date: 27 August 2019 Case number: No. 17-2472 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm
Catherine Martin Christopher, Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:13 pm
Imprisonment Firstly, Ms Haigh correctly states that she was sent to prison, but the sentence she received was nothing to do with the ‘telling the truth’ she refers to in the same breath (we’ll come to that bit in a minute). [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am
Recent Articles of Interest“Clarifying the Concepts of Transmutation and Commingling” by Joel R. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 6:47 am
The Board’s obviousness finding predicated on erroneous claim construction was reversed and the case remanded (MTD Products Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 4:30 am
In the case of McFarland v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery chronicled the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
• Douglas V. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:32 am
Cristalia used the expert report and civil procedure rules to state that it would be illegal to decide a case against the evidence produced. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
However, in R. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 10:17 am
Christopher R. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:38 am
Obviousness The Judge rejected Takeda’s classical obviousness attack on the basis of skilled person’s motivation to actually make the product (something that is not relevant when considering novelty and the state of the art). [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 3:15 am
Ltd. v Hai Lun Tang, 2019 TMOB 54 https://t.co/V2PWbByXaB 2019-07-14 YouTube 'Blocks' Popular MP3 Stream-Ripping Sites https://t.co/myg5hyvgq4 2019-07-14 A Win for Browsewrap? [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
Arcano, Christopher M. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 9:24 am
Hall and Christopher F. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:17 am
From Commonwealth v. [read post]
