Search for: "State v. City of Seattle" Results 241 - 260 of 537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2015, 1:35 pm by Dean Freeman
Additional Resources: Redmond Town Center sued over death of toddler hit by car, Sept. 11, 2015, By Sara Jean Green, The Seattle Times More Blog Entries: Castro v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Quick answer: no” [David Henderson; WSJ/@scottlincicome on seasonal pool-supply company] Hillary Clinton and the Market Basket Stores myth [James Taranto] Labor Department proposes tightening regulation of retirement financial advisers [Kenneth Bentsen, The Hill] Proposed: “well-orchestrated” state ballot initiatives aimed at overturning employment at will [Rand Wilson, Workplace Fairness] My view: “Everybody wins with at-will employment” [Ethan Blevins,… [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:00 am by Keelin Curran and Alyson Palmer
Jones denied the International Franchise Association’s (IFA) motion for preliminary injunction in the IFA v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am by WIMS
<> Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
 Arguing for the local government and two police officers in San Francisco v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:31 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Coming to you from yet another sunny day in Seattle—the city seems to really be taking advantage of the extra light—it’s time for today’s Top 10. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:27 am by Keelin Curran and Alyson Palmer
Even if the City of Seattle is successful at the hearing, the Ordinance must face another formidable challenger: the Washington State Legislature. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 3:07 pm by M. Varn Chandola
  The first indication of the very limited privacy that DUI clients in custody possess in the  ability to confidentially communicate with an attorney was noted in City of Seattle v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:09 pm
Lawmakers’ content- or viewpoint-based intentions generally don’t invalidate facially content-neutral speech-restrictive laws, see United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541, 543 (1967) (“The businessman, like the occupant of a residence, has a constitutional right to go about his business free from unreasonable official entries upon his private commercial property. [read post]