Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 241 - 260
of 27,299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm
(See, Ghory v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:00 pm
Initially, in State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:00 am
On October 23, 2009, the California Court of Appeal held in Pineda v Williams-Sonoma it was not unlawful for Williams-Sonoma to ask Pineda for her zip code at the time of purchase, even if that zip code was later used to obtain, view, and distribute her addresses to third parties. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
" As the Supreme Court of the United States recognized in Carey [v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:37 pm
United States and reassess the definition of a “crime of violence” under 18 US Code § 924(c)(3). [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 9:56 am
Ga. 2017). [4] Code Revision Commission v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 9:15 pm
The court addressed Texas Insurance Code chapter 542 violations (often called prompt payment of claims) in Barbara Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 8:27 am
Fischer v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:18 pm
City of Bonney Lake v Kanany, 2014 WL 7403963 (WA App. 12/30/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/D2%2042988-8-II%20Part%20Published%20Opinion.pdf Filed under: Current Caselaw, Due Process, Enforcement Tagged: accessory dwelling units, code violations, zoning enforcement [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
Forget code. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Code § 1030(e)(11). [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
For example, in Graat v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
Even Doe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:59 am
Brown is widely cited as one of the most significant decisions interpreting the United States Supreme Court’s AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 11:44 am
On December 3, 2013, the Supreme Court issued its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 11:44 am
On December 3, 2013, the Supreme Court issued its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 8:38 am
International Code Council, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:08 pm
“ ‘Virtually any law -- federal, state or local -- can serve as a predicate for an action under Business and Professions Code section 17200. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 12:49 pm
Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 10:38 am
The California Supreme Court granted review on August 19, 2015, stating the issues as follows: (1) Is the plaintiff in a representative action under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (Lab. [read post]