Search for: "State v. Cox" Results 241 - 260 of 1,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2013, 8:02 am by Steven Boranian
And the court should provide a necessary check against jury discretion with its power to decide issues as a matter of law and grant new trials.Juries operating outside these parameters might not come to fair results, through no fault of their own, and we think that is what went wrong in Cox v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
., Oxford University Press 2015)).Michael John DeBoer, Legislating Morality Progressively -- The Contraceptive Coverage Mandate, Religious Freedom, and Public Health Policy and Ethics, (Journal of Law and Health, Vol. 28, p. 62, 2015).Doug Coulson, British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 9:00 am by Ellen D. Marcus
Amicus (or friend of the court) briefs are pouring into the Supreme Court in the case of Lawson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:38 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crawford & Anor v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 (17 February 2012) Oxford City Council v Basey [2012] EWCA Civ 115 (15 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) AB & Anor v Home Office [2012] EWHC 226 (QB) (16 February 2012) Gold & Anor v Cox & Anor [2012] EWHC 272 (QB) (17 February 2012) Independent Police Complaints Commission v Warner &… [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Erin Sutton
The bill currently awaits Governor Spencer Cox’s signature and would take effect sixty (60) days after its signing.[1] Originally enacted in 2010, the Online Prescribing Act has allowed health care providers to register with the State to prescribe and dispense certain FDA-approved drugs via online pharmacies and utilization of telehealth visits. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Had issuers supported the proposal by the Cox Commission, it is likely that Mary Schapiro's Commission would not have proposed an access rule, Dodd-Frank would not have given access authority to the Commission, and shareholders would not now be singularly focused on the issue. [read post]