Search for: "State v. D. A. R."
Results 241 - 260
of 16,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2011, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
In this case, R&D's view of the facts was readily brushed aside. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:05 pm
In this set of short wins, the one that I’d like to call attention to is United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:25 am
Regina (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice (JUSTICE and another intervening); In re MacDermott’s and McCartney’s Applications for Judicial Review (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 18; [2011] WLR (D) 155 “A miscarriage of justice, within the meaning of section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, occurred where a new fact so undermined the evidence against the defendant that no conviction could possibly be based upon it. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:39 am
Cir.): BEFORE: Ginsburg, Henderson, and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges O R D E R It is, on the court’s own motion, ORDERED that the parties file supplemental briefs addressing the following questions: (1) After the Home Rule Act, Pub. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 12:49 am
Supp. 2d 1164 (D. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:19 am
Supp. 2d 1164 (D. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:14 am
Oguz v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Centre for Advice on Individual Rights in Europe intervening) C-186/10; [2011] WLR (D) 259 “Article 41(1) of the Additional Protocol, signed on 23 November 1970 at Brussels and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2760/72 (OJ 1973 C 113 p17), had to be interpreted as meaning that it could be relied on by a Turkish national who, having… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:42 am
Lis v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
NS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Amnesty International Ltd and others intervening); ME and others v Refugee Applications Comr and another (Amnesty International Ltd and others intervening); (Joined Cases C-411/10 and C-493/10); [2011] WLR (D) 388 “European Union law precluded the application of a conclusive presumption that the member state responsible for examining an asylum claim pursuant to Council… [read post]
15 May 2011, 6:28 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
In H&R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:48 pm
(Veera v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
R. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:10 am
No. 09-1519 (D. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm
The Court’s reasoning Silber J considered the case of R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15 and concluded that even though that case is awaiting a ruling from the Grand Chamber in Strasbourg, he was bound by the House of Lords’ ruling that the prohibitions on political advertising contained in sections 319 and 321 of the 2003 Act were justified as being necessary in a democratic society… [read post]
6 May 2020, 7:05 am
R. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 1:25 pm
Distinctions between tort and contract theories of recovery: Distinction between Common law and state statutes: In Aas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:00 pm
The case is ASARCO LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:56 am
” Linda R. [read post]
