Search for: "State v. Dakota" Results 241 - 260 of 2,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by James G. Dimeas, Esq.
The case is actually three separate cases consolidated into one case captioned, Birchfield v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 1:00 pm by Paul Caron
Hayes Holderness (Richmond) presents Navigating 21st Century Tax Jurisdiction at Temple today as part of its Faculty Colloquium Series: Hailed as a massive victory for the states, the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:00 am by Paul Caron
Rev. 116 (2021): The United States Supreme Court saved the states’ sales tax base in the landmark case of South Dakota v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:45 am by Harold O'Grady
North Dakota, 504 US 298  (1992) in which the Supreme Court ruled that States cannot require a retailer to collect sales taxes on its behalf, [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 12:20 pm by Paul Caron
Rev. 1 (2019): Hailed as a massive victory for the states, the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 2:59 pm by Unknown
Army Corps of Engineers, Dakota Access, LLP (Dakota Access Pipeline; APA; NEPA; NHPA; Mni Waconi Act)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlConfederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:24 pm
The United States needs new refineries, but... [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:28 am by Adam Thimmesch
By now, anyone who reads this post should be aware that the Supreme Court decided South Dakota v. [read post]
On January 12th, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 5:28 am by Andrew Hamm
Securities and Exchange Commission, South Dakota v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Sachs (Harvard; Google Scholar), Abortion and the Wayfair Case: Yesterday in my conflict of laws class I taught South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
North Dakota unbalanced the American retail market with its preference for out-of-state over in-state sellers. [read post]