Search for: "State v. Family Child Care" Results 241 - 260 of 3,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2022, 5:08 pm by Anthony Zaller
(ca.gov) Under the existing law, the California Family Rights Act, an employer with 5 or more employees are not allowed to refuse to grant a request from an employee who meets specified requirements to take up to a total of 12 workweeks in any 12-month period for family care and medical leave. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:34 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
We must remember that the criminalization of abortion in several states will be accompanied by an expansion of the surveillance state which, as stated before, may have life-altering consequences for immigrants, and their families and communities. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I am an only child, and he has become one of my de facto brothers over the years. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:15 am by Kyle Persaud
See, for example, ,Matter of Severns’ Estate; ,Crump’s Estate v. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 7:25 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Cuban Family Code also states that, in the event of divorce, the “court will grant patria potestas, establishing as a rule that both parents shall retain it over their minors. [read post]
AB 1949: Protections for Bereavement Leave AB 1949 would amend the California Family Rights Act (“CFRA”) to prohibit an employer from denying a request from an employee with at least 30 days of active service to take up to five days of bereavement leave upon the death of a family member, defined as spouse or a child, parent, sibling, grandparent, grandchild, domestic partner, or parent-in-law. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is a specific member of this family that can cause bloody diarrhea (hemorrhagic colitis) in humans. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 10:54 am by Georgialee Lang
Dilico Anishinabek Child and Family Care 2022 ONCA 240 where the court considered whether the child’s caregivers since she was 8-days old could bring a parenting application pursuant to the Children’s Law Reform Act. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
However, the present position in law is already in effect (owing to the impact of Strasbourg jurisprudence) that the court would not make such an order or finding unless there were exceptional and compelling reasons why it was in the public interest for the disclosure to be made: see Mersey Care NHS Trust v Ackroyd [2008] EMLR 1 (CA) at [17]. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am by Eugene Volokh
Oct. 8, 2010) (quoting the rabbi's letter): This past Shabbat I suggested that this incident should inspire all of us to be extremely careful about engaging in Lashon HaRa [i.e., derogatory speech]. [read post]