Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 241 - 260
of 8,986
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2010, 8:47 pm
Puleo v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:00 am
First, the Court pointed out that this same argument was rejected by Judge Henry Herlong in State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 3:25 am
We’ll have to wait and see whether courts in other states with the same statute follow the New Jersey Supreme Court’s first-impression interpretation setting a “high bar. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 10:14 am
Under Fourth Circuit’s approach, the Court would not have had jurisdiction over last Term’s Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:48 pm
On October 3rd of this year, the Supreme Court will entertain arguments is New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:03 pm
The Court first finds that the State violated Batson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:09 am
The court dodged this issue in Gill v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 6:00 am
By Jeremy Clare The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that the district court erred when it concluded that UPS’s CBA required Title VII claims to be brought under the CBA’s grievance process. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:33 am
Cardiff Magistrates’ Court [2007] EWHC 1846 (Admin) “Where a district judge had decided a preliminary issue as to jurisdiction his ruling could properly be challenged by way of case stated or judicial review. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:35 pm
First, the defendant would be convicted after trial, appeal to the Appeals Court and to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Since the first case of this new era, Filartiga v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:41 am
The district court agreed that one of the canons was unconstitutional and the state defendants appeal. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 3:33 am
Ruling in a pre-trial matter in New Mexico, Judge Timothy Garcia of Santa Fe County's First Judicial District Court held the state's death penalty law to be unconstitutional based on a study by the Capital Jury Project. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:09 pm
Confronting an issue of "first impression" in Massachusetts and the First Circuit, the Supreme Judicial Court joined with the majority position taken by the 8th and 3rd Circuit Courts of Appeal and courts elsewhere in holding that a malicious prosecution tort "occurs" for purposes of triggering the duty to defend when the underlying litigation is first filed, not when it is dismissed. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 9:10 am
On January 17, 2017, the California Supreme Court denied the losing appellants’ petition for writ of supersedeas, stay request, and petition for review of the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in Mission Bay Alliance v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:59 am
Supreme Court, where the six-justice majority ruled in his favor in Kennedy v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:36 pm
In a published opinion filed December 15, 2021, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 5) affirmed a trial court’s judgment entered after sustaining a demurrer to a writ petition in a CEQA action without leave to amend. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Supreme Court has sent Weyerhaeuser Company v United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 586 U. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
State, Court of Appeals No. 79A02-0603-CR-180 (Ind. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:48 am
Previously, HERE, I noted the Maine Supreme Judicial Court's opinion in JPMorgan Chase Bank v. [read post]
