Search for: "State v. Grounds" Results 241 - 260 of 40,814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2012, 9:30 am by Ilya Somin
The brief and a summary of its argument are available here: In 2010, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 1:40 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
Later, in a second petition for state postconviction relief, Cone raised the claim that the State had violated Brady v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:38 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection and another [2008] EWCA Civ 870; [2008] WLR (D) 273 “Information supplied by applicants for animal experimentation licences was exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 if the official in possession of the information knew or had reasonable grounds for believing that it was given in confidence, which was a subjective test requiring consideration of… [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:08 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court will hear the appeal in R (Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department on 25 and 26 July 2016, where it will be asked to consider a challenge to a deportation order, on the grounds that the appellant ought to have been entitled to automatic British citizenship at birth, and as such should not be deported to Jamaica. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
Advocate General Szpunar, in his opinion in Hauck, states at the referred to passage (emphasis added):99. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:13 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
The issue on appeal is whether Morgan is entitled to a new trial on the grounds of ineffective assistance [...] [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that in a multi-issue jury trial, it’s rare for an acquittal to ground issue estoppel.The issue facing the top court in R. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 8:00 pm by Jason Mazzone
The oral argument this past Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Hope Lewis - Guest
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]