Search for: "State v. Gump" Results 241 - 260 of 376
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2009, 7:00 am
Yesterday Howe & Russell and Akin Gump, in conjunction with the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, filed this  cert. petition, raising a question regarding the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
  Last year, I directed a project in which a team of Akin Gump summer associates extensively reviewed Judge Sotomayor’s opinions. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:40 am
United States; Shell Oil Company v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:53 am
LA Akin Gump associate Scott Street summarizes yesterday’s oral argument in United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:06 am
U.S.,  United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Goldstein, of Akin Gump in Washington and of this blog, will argue for the respondents. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
Opinion below(7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 08-769 Title: United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
” The petition in IMS Health v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:32 am
Docket: 08-567 Title: Agripost, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
United States Issue: Whether Harris v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Amelia County Sheriff's Office7th Cir.o Muslim Associate States Cause of Action Against Large Law Firm For Post 9-11 DiscriminationHasan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:28 pm
(Akin Gump represents the petitioner.) [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
(Disclosure: Akin Gump represents the petitioner.) [read post]