Search for: "State v. Hale" Results 241 - 260 of 1,072
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm by Guest Blogger
Their super abilities were the same, as was their stated intent to battle against “evil and injustice,” (Detective Comics. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:25 am by Dennis Crouch
Hall, 440 U.S. 410 (1979), which permits a sovereign State to be haled into another State’s courts without its consent, should be overruled. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm by Will Baude
Br. 35–36, but neither did they leave each State wholly free to hale other States before its courts, contra Br. in Opp. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:14 am by ASAD KHAN
In particular, treaty obligations cease to apply to a territory where it secedes from the state which entered into the treaty, or for example where a formerly dependent territory becomes independent from the parent state which entered into the treaty. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am by HANNAH WILCE
Lady Hale stated that: “The question is whether, in the light of the words used, their context and the purpose of the legislation, Parliament must have meant the Crown to be bound. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A claim for simple negligence is “restricted to those cases where the alleged negligent act is readily determinable by the trier of the facts on common knowledge,” whereas a claim for malpractice is one that typically requires expert testimony or other specialized knowledge (Hale v State of New York, 53 AD2d 1025, 1025 [4th Dept 1976]). [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
Gender Inequality in 21st Century Britain: Using litigation as a tool Direct Sex Discrimination and Disadvantage to women: R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 Introduction: Does Law Have a Gender? [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
S. 186, 189, 204–208 (1946) (payroll records); Hale v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am by CECILY WHITE
The Supreme Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, with whom Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson agreed) unanimously allowed the Commissioner’s appeal. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am by CMS
This is outwith the competence of the Scottish Parliament. 1453: The Advocate General states that the Scottish Parliament cannot proceed on basis that it will amend its legislation in future if it needs to. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]