Search for: "State v. Hodges"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
In Loving v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Hodges, the 2015 U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am
We explained in Red Families v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Hodges. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 1:20 pm
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made this declaration in her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
Hodges. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Hodges, for instance, it was already the law in 37 states and the District of Columbia.I understand why so many on the left worship the Court—or rather, the myth of the Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 5:55 am
Here is the abstract: This essay examines the United States Supreme Court’s July 9, 2020 decision in McGirt v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am
The (majority) Supreme Court’s decision The Supreme Court (with majority judgments from Lord Reed and Lord Hodge) closely examined the authorities on the principle of reflective loss, in particular Prudential and Johnson. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 1:49 pm
Hodges (2015), and Pavan v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 6:54 am
Coleman v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:57 am
Note that the order in which I just stated the parties is Appellant v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm
My colleague Scott Hodge recently pointed to Tax Foundation research from 1950 that shows how harmful those policies are.[20] The real challenge of any excess profits tax, and one that Christians recently noted in a presentation, is defining what is excessive.[21] As U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:15 am
• Lester V. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:59 am
In Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
Hodges, there is no such wave. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:46 am
From the New Yorker: Today, the official archive of gay marriage is still in its infancy: in the United States, June marked the fifth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Hodges (2015) [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a celebration… [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Hodges, there is no such wave. [read post]
