Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2023, 12:00 am
This encompasses effectively all of the work in question, pointed out Master Robertson, since the reality is that except for items like interior unit paint, most of a condo apartment is composed of common property: The roof is common property. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Gaines v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:27 pm
Islamic Republic of Iran v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 6:00 am
Sentenced to six months house arrest and a fine of $10,000.United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:04 am
Comprised of both donated collections and items deposited with the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:26 am
Is it enough for the prosecution to merely state the value? [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 10:58 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:34 pm
The underlying idea – that a person can be said to have forfeited his or her rights in a particular item of property by using it to commit a crime – is difficult to challenge, but some observers believe that the remedy has been abused in some jurisdictions. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:34 pm
The underlying idea – that a person can be said to have forfeited his or her rights in a particular item of property by using it to commit a crime – is difficult to challenge, but some observers believe that the remedy has been abused in some jurisdictions. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 8:58 am
But, the owners believe that the intellectual property concerns are in the past. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:02 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:41 am
The case is Barnet Recovable Trust, and Sotheby’s Inc., Plaintiff-Appellees v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:41 am
The case is Barnet Recovable Trust, and Sotheby’s Inc., Plaintiff-Appellees v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
