Search for: "State v. J. P."
Results 241 - 260
of 4,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
A prima facie inference of copying is raised when there is substantial similarity between the original work and the allegedly infringing work, together with proof o the possibility of access (IBCOS Computers Ltd v Barclays Finance Ltd [1994] FSR 275, p.296-297). [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:47 am
HvJ EU 24 november 2022, ECLI:EU:C:2022:923, NIPR 2022-549 (Tilman/Unilever) / p. 51-58 Abstract Tilman v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
On the same day, Linden J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the libel case of Evans v McMahon and Kerr J heard an appeal in the case of Samuels v Laycock. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:30 am
HealthSmart Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 5 April 2023, Hill J ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs on an indemnity basis in the case of Rayney v Reynolds [No 4] [2022] WASC 360. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 2:20 pm
Richard J. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father J. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Lovitch, Samantha P. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:57 am
Peter P. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:36 am
From C.M. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm
Source: Baron, J., Arque-Castells, P., Leonard, A., et al., Empirical Assessment of Potential Challenges in SEP Licensing, European Commission, DG GROW, 2023. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 12:16 pm
Shine by Lauren Myracle; j. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
Co., 497 A.2d 322, 327 (R.I. 1985); Hart v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Why § 230 Likely Doesn't Provide Immunity for Libels Composed by ChatGPT, Bard, etc.
27 Mar 2023, 9:30 am
Rosenthal, 146 P.3d 510 (Cal. 2006); Phan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:22 pm
Courier-J. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am
For example, the United States’s general copyright duration is 70 years after the death of the author, and Mexico’s duration is 100 years after the death of the author. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 12:53 pm
P. 4(k)(2); see also Atchley v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 2:09 am
J., Pool, V., Cramer, E. [read post]
