Search for: "State v. Jonathan Thomas"
Results 241 - 260
of 658
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Decisions about voter list maintenance, one of the most essential bureaucratic duties of state election officials, received intense scrutiny in several states this year. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Rather, Oldham and Ho favor the framework advanced by Justice Thomas in Murphy v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
- Preview of Jonathan Cavanaugh v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Hansen Knick v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
Schramm & Ekaterina Yahyaoui Krivenko, Germany v Italy Marta Carneiro, Kirsten Ketscher & Freya Semanda, Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others Sara Bengtson, Damian Gonzalez-Salzberg, Loveday Hodson & Paul Johnson, Christine Goodwin v the United Kingdom Amel Alghrani, Amal Ali & Jill Marshall, Leyla Sahin v Turkey Nicola Barker, Burden v the United Kingdom Shazia… [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 1:41 pm
In Mitchell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 12:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:34 am
First up was United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
In Flowers v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 12:44 pm
Justices Thomas and Gorsuch also wrote opinions concurring in the judgment, suggesting the case should not have been heard, either because the plaintiffs lacked standing (Gorsuch, joined by Thomas) or because the Establishment Clause shouldn't apply to the states or to monuments (Thomas). [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
Justice Thomas concurred. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Thomas Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2019).Andrew M. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 10:38 am
In Mont v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Hardwick in Lawrence v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:18 pm
Collier, and Justice Thomas's opinion concurring in the denial of certiorari in Price v. [read post]