Search for: "State v. Jose R." Results 241 - 260 of 512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:10 pm by CJLF Staff
Chuck Hopson (R), dog owners could face life in prison if their dog kills a child under the age of 18 or an adult older than 65. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 pm by Chuck Peterson
That question was again considered this week by the First Circuit Court of Appeals in US v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 pm by Chuck Peterson
That question was again considered this week by the First Circuit Court of Appeals in US v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 4:19 pm by David Ettinger
This Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear a death penalty appeal — People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 11:04 am
A recent case out of the Bay Area, Series AGI West Linn of Appian Group Investors DE LLC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 11:18 am
According to the article, " In November 2007 president Leonel Fernandez authorized the deportation of the Puerto Rican narcotics trafficker Jose David Figueroa Agosto, at the United States government's request, but the Dominican and U.S. agencies then became strangely disinterested. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor Jose Borges moved, pursuant to CPLR 5225 and 5240, to compel assignment of Defendant/Judgment Debtor Alfred Placeres’s potential legal malpractice claim against Defendant’s friend and former attorney to satisfy Plaintiff’s judgment (motion sequence 023). [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:10 am
  The decision came in the case of Medellin v. [read post]