Search for: "State v. Kay" Results 241 - 260 of 640
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2010, 8:21 am by Nabiha Syed
Kai Ryssdal of Marketplace interviews Dahlia Lithwick on this Term’s business-related cases. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 3:55 am
LEXIS 9298 (ED CA, Jan. 28, 2009), a federal magistrate judge recommended dismissal of an inmate's free exercise and RLUIPA challenge to the state Department of Corrections hair-length regulations.In Kay v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:53 pm
" Maybe Administrator Babbitt got it right when he concluded his remarks by stating that "if you think the safety bar is set too high, your sights are set way too low. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:40 am by Dave
The Court cites McCarthy v SoS for Home Department and Abdirahman v SoS for Work and Pensions in support, and explained (politely) a comment made by Kay LJ in Kaczmarek v SoS for Work and Pensions (at [23]) as well as R(Badar) v Ealing LBC (irrelevant as right of residence was not contested). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:40 am by Dave
The Court cites McCarthy v SoS for Home Department and Abdirahman v SoS for Work and Pensions in support, and explained (politely) a comment made by Kay LJ in Kaczmarek v SoS for Work and Pensions (at [23]) as well as R(Badar) v Ealing LBC (irrelevant as right of residence was not contested). [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:15 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITImmigration LawBIA's Refusal to Reconsider Reversal of IJ's Grant Of Status Adjustment Under CSPA Is Denied ReviewRi Kai Lin v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am by Blog  Editorial
After two days of argument (spread over three days due to the State Opening of Parliament) judgment was reserved. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:31 am by Daniel Hemel
His response seemed to please Kagan, who said: “[O]kay, I get it. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:30 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
What qualifies as "property" and the right to exclude: While the consent of individual officials representing the United States cannot "estop" the United States, see Montana v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]