Search for: "State v. Kiss" Results 241 - 260 of 553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2014, 4:49 am by SHG
At the WaPo Conspiracy, insomniac lawprof Orin Kerr posts about an important Second Circuit opinion: The Second Circuit has handed down a very important new Fourth Amendment case, United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Edgar Chen
Yes Trump has been arrested and charged in four state and federal cases, three of which* are still pending: New York v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:10 pm by Samuel Bagenstos
United States Steel Corporation, to be argued on Monday. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:20 pm by Michel-Adrien Sheppard
Santa apparently managed to get himself into a spot of trouble here in Canada but a court decision wisely spared him: “Santa’s largesse got him in trouble in Community Fundraising Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:59 am by Darius Whelan
 At the time he referred to s.51 of the Electoral Act 1923, but that had been repealed and replaced in 1992.In a similar vein, the European Court of Human Rights has overturned an absolute bar on voting by any person under partial guardianship, irrespective of his or her actual faculties in Kiss v Hungary (2010). [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:38 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
A recent unpublished decision issued by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on May 21, 2012, in Kiefer v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 21 April 2022, the United States, Canada, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea and Chinese Taipei published a declaration establishing the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules Forum. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:09 am by Adam Wagner
This was because the result of the hearing would not have a substantial influence on the secretary of state’s decision whether to place the man on the list of people barred from working with children. [read post]