Search for: "State v. Knowles" Results 241 - 260 of 440
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Xu was indicted for committing the crime of subverting state power on 5 August 2021. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
The Home Office rejected the request, stating that it is not in the public interest to disclose any of the requested information. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgement was given for the defendant in Goldsmith v Bissett-Powell [2022] EWHC 1591 (QB) by Julian Knowles J (heard on 13 January 2022). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
United States X, formerly known as Twitter, has filed a federal defamat [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am by INFORRM
China The State Council of China published the Regulations on Administration of Network Data Security, which will take effect on 1 January 2025. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
On 20 October 2023, Julian Knowles J heard a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Camacho v OCS Group UK Limited. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
” United States The US songwriter Phoebe Bridgers is being sued for defamation by producer Chris Nelson, who claims she “intentionally used her high-profile public platform on Instagram to publish false and defamatory statements regarding [Nelson] in order to destroy his reputation. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  More.Thank you, Helen Knowles-Gardner, for noting that the US Supreme Court has digitized and posted its Journal online! [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]