Search for: "State v. Linda D." Results 241 - 260 of 514
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2016, 5:11 am by Amy Howe
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse weighs in on last week’s oral arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
United States, characterizing it as “one of several recent signs that ideology does not always fuel the justices’ decisions. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The question of unions’ role in American life found its way into the Supreme Court earlier this month, in the case of Friedrichs v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider two issues relating to federal computer crimes, for this blog; I did the same for Green v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 5:04 am by Amy Howe
United States comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate and Danielle Blevins of Talk Radio News Service. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:17 am by Amy Howe
” In the Oxonian Review, Ryan Azad reviews Sisters in Law, Linda Hirshman’s book on Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:02 am by Amy Howe
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses the prospect that the Court will take on the challenge to Texas’s new abortion laws, arguing that the “stakes couldn’t be higher, either for women who live in the growing number of states governed by anti-abortion politicians or for the court itself. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 10:41 pm by Jeff Gamso
 Both denied opportunities they'd have gotten after law school had they been men. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 4:41 am by Amy Howe
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks at the Connecticut Supreme Court’s recent ruling abolishing the death penalty in that state; she argues that the court “not only produced an important ruling for its own jurisdiction” but also “addressed the United States Supreme Court frankly and directly,” “at a crucial moment of mounting unease. [read post]