Search for: "State v. Little Bear"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,688
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
The actual arguments the parties have offered to the Court in the Affordable Care Act case the Court will hear next Tuesday bear little resemblance to the “Congress requiring everyone to eat broccoli” caricatures that have dominated much of the public debate. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 4:12 am
Civil Service Commission’s jurisdictional reclassification of 29 titles to the noncompetitive class violated Article V, §6’s merit and fitness mandateMatter of Brynien v New York State Dept. of Civ. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 6:07 pm
Rocky Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 4:30 am
Following the sale, Marks’ Little Hearts commenced a state court action accusing Carter of initiating the bankruptcy proceeding solely to forestall an adverse ruling in the state court litigation. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:59 am
The case is Harris Faulkner v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:33 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Dale Beaver v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am
HB 25 garnered little debate or controversy and will allow the State Engineer to consider nonuse when acting on change applications. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm
In this regard, it bears noting that some of the Supreme Court’s most celebrated (and legally correct) decisions (such as Brown v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 7:57 am
Most TikTok users have paid little or no attention to how the CCP has wrapped them up in a lawfare bear hug driven by social media addiction, but Congress has and now the courts are taking the TikTok threat very seriously. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
Political Identity v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
Anderson v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 3:02 pm
See blog here, discussing United States v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:37 am
Yes, it's perhaps a little bit of "background" (of a sort) about the dispute. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:15 am
Co v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 1:48 pm
See SCOTUSBlog coverage here and opinion here.I think CAAF will need to re-look at the rule in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:59 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:11 pm
Although there was general public interest in corruption in the foreign country connected to the allegations against X Ltd and in X Ltd itself, but that had little or no bearing on whether there was a public interest justifying the publication of the information in the article. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:30 pm
If there are objections as between a third party or another party then that is very likely to be of little consequence. [read post]
