Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 241 - 260
of 3,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
As demonstrated by Mamatkulov v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 25, DFAL’s criterion of serious irreversible harm shows some intersection with the ECtHR’s application of rule 39 relief. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
First, on Monday 4 and Tuesday 5 April 2011, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 1:25 pm
. -- then imagine what it's like in a state prison.Why read Lord of the Flies when you can get a similar, nonfictional recitation from the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
Lord Kerr and Baroness Hale dissented from the majority. [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:07 am
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) was heard on 8 February 2012 and judgment was reserved. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 3:21 am
The Court considered the sovereignty of Parliament to be critical, and stated the Crown is not entitled to change domestic law through exercise of its prerogative powers. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:58 am
In a series of decisions - Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:04 pm
Bruce Lord Wilder Freedom of Speech in the United States from The Federalist to McCutcheon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 4:05 am
Supreme Court's landmark decision in School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:55 pm
R (on the application of Evans) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1146 (Admin) - Read judgment The High Court has found that the Ministry of Justice, when making a decision to cease the state’s funding of judicial review challenges on purely public interest grounds (apart from one exception), took into account the fact that to do so would reduce the number of decisions being made which were not in the… [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:59 am
In Jones v Saudi Arabia the House of Lords concluded that the legal test for establishing the requisite connection between the impugned acts of the foreign state official and the foreign state as a corporate entity should be supplied by the rules of attribution in the law of state responsibility. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
On Wednesday 23 and Thursday 24 March, Bloomsbury International Limited and others v Sea Fish Industry Authority and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs will be heard by Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, Lords Mance and Collins. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
Lord Chief Justice Camden in Entick v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm
Referring to the use of the power to order publications of a summary of court judgments in s.12 of the Defamation Act 2013, and comments made on this by Mr Justice Nicklin in a 2018 case, Lord Justice Warby states [55]: ….Counsel [Mr Speck] went so far as to suggest in writing that in this case this remedy is ‘intended more as a species of punishment and retribution rather than a necessary and proportionate measure in the interests of the claimant or the public’.… [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am
In giving the lead judgment Lord Neuberger referred to the test founded in Janoweic v Russia (2013) 58 EHRR 792 for establishing when a case can be brought under the art 2 investigation duty if the deaths in question occurred prior to when the state in question signed up to the Convention or when it first gave the right to petition. [read post]
