Search for: "State v. Lucas"
Results 241 - 260
of 622
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2023, 2:51 pm
Louis and Davis v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
Lucas Cty. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:34 pm
After all, it was a shoreline development ban -- also based on erosion -- that resulted in the Lucas decision (Lucas v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 8:11 pm
The EU and Member States: FDI, Portfolio Investments, Golden Powers and SWFs Anna De Luca 8. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
App. 2008), the case in which a California Court of Appeals held that a municipality's development moratorium was a Lucas taking. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm
In Lingle v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm
In Lingle v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:34 am
In D-V, LRA is currently ranked 8th in the state. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm
No dice, held the court of appeals, in Lucas, "the United States Supreme Court held that in a takings case, where the property owner challenges a regulation as denying all economically beneficial or productive use of land, the regulatory action is 'compensable without a case-specific inquiry into the public interest advanced in support of the restraint.'" Slip op. at 9 (quoting Lucas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 7:46 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:43 am
Cal., 508 U.S. 602, 645 (1993) the court also pointed out that even if the district court’s financial analysis had been appropriate, diminution in value of property less than the 100%, the categorical taking established by the Supreme Court in Lucas v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:23 am
See Lucas v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 11:06 am
Damages Citing the case of Morris v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:39 pm
In dicta in Lingle v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
That principle may ultimately prove dispositive in BP v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:15 pm
Gregory Lucas v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:13 pm
They claim that Goldberg v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:15 pm
The Judge allowed the application stating that “there seems to be no reason of principle why, in appropriate circumstances, a source may not be held liable to contribute to damages payable by a publisher to whom the source has provided a story for publication” (at paragraph [43]). [read post]
