Search for: "State v. M. S. P."
Results 241 - 260
of 4,552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Thomas M. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Deanna M. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:39 am
” ABA Civil Discovery Standards, p. 34. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:36 am
From C.M. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm
For an institution that likes to lecture the whole world--at times even the United States--about democracy and the rule of law, it's remarkable what the Commission's draft SEP regulation envisages. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:06 pm
"] From Blankenship v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 12:03 pm
” For ISPs treated as contractors, it is more complicated, but the outcome is likely the same: The Proposed Guidance states that “Recipients may agree to permit” such ISPs to retain income generated by the ISP “provided that such an agreement is consistent with the state’s procurement requirements or, in the case of a local or Tribal government, is consistent with the Uniform Guidance provisions on procurement. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
If there is a genuine dispute about the facts—e.g., when an AI program accurately communicates allegations made by a credible source, but the subject of the allegations disputes the source's accuracy—then I'm inclined to think that the AI company shouldn't be put in a position where it has to independently investigate the charges. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Why § 230 Likely Doesn't Provide Immunity for Libels Composed by ChatGPT, Bard, etc.
27 Mar 2023, 9:30 am
Rosenthal, 146 P.3d 510 (Cal. 2006); Phan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Roy Pénal: Les 3 accusés qui se sont vu reprocher d’avoir bloqué la circulation du pont-tunnel Louis-Hyppolite-La fontaine sont déclarés coupables d’avoir commis un méfait; ils ne se sont pas limités à communiquer un message, mais ont commis des gestes qui n’étaient pas raisonnablement nécessaires pour ce faire (C.Q.). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:21 am
In other words, there has always been a higher standard of proof for the defendant’s mental state. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:08 am
In other words, there has always been a higher standard of proof for the defendant’s mental state. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Mitchell, Why Was Roe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 2:09 am
V., Cotter, S. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
Seljak v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
To be sure, it's possible I'm missing something that one or more of the briefs or the Justices will note in order to preserve SCOTUS jurisdiction. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
Fang, V. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Pharmacist entered into contract that included non-competition covenant In M&P Drug Mart Inc. v. [read post]
