Search for: "State v. Maes" Results 241 - 260 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Violinist Vanessa-Mae has been awarded damages for defamation from the International Ski Federation (FIS). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Among other cases that have survived are those involving Citigroup (refer here), AIG (here), Countrywide (here), Fannie Mae (here), Washington Mutual (here), New Century Financial (here), Sallie Mae (here) and Bank of America (here). [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
With the regulatory stories of 2012 coming to an end, RegBlog would like to take this opportunity to reflect back on what has been a year of significant regulatory developments in the United States and throughout the world. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
In September 2008, the government takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was followed by the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America and an $85 billion (and now $170 billion) government investment in American International Group. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm by Mandelman
  So, as is the case with most mortgages, they are sold by the originating bank (or mortgage company) to either Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Friends, we are excited to share that the Supreme Court has just taken up Gonzalez v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States) prohibits such blanket interception. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
These unlawful marketing activities were responsible for Pfizer paying the largest fine in United States history. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:06 pm
Recourse loans exist alongside non-recourse loans which, as the name implies, offer the lender no recourse against the borrower beyond foreclosure of the mortgage instrument. [4] Typically, non-recourse loans offer a higher degree of risk, and therefore carry a higher interest rate to match. [5] The banks run the risk that owners will abandon properties which they can no longer afford in a poor state of upkeep, reducing the value of the home, and therefore the amount the bank will receive… [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
So writes The Onion in an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to take up Novak v. [read post]