Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 241 - 260 of 19,773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am by Woodrow Pollack
The district court agreed because there had been no "injury-in-fact" to the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 3:01 am
 Another factor is the question of what would become of such property (including trade marks) once forfeited to the State. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:37 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Just answerin’—and in only two words: Presidential Immunity (see Nixon v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:34 am by Ruthann Robson
Haley, Judge Richard Mark Gergel held that South Carolina's same-sex marriage bans (by statute and state constitutional amendment) is... [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am by Marcel Pemsel
The CJEU answered the question in the affirmative but the court seized will only have jurisdiction to decide on the damage caused in the territory of the Member State to which it belongs. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal examined in detail the nature and role of survey evidence. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:52 am by Nedim Malovic
In an interesting decision earlier this year, the General Court upheld the EUIPO Fifth Board of Appeal’s decision regarding a likelihood of confusion between the Bezos Family Foundation’s application for EU trade mark (EUTM) registration of ‘VROOM’, the name of a global programme aimed at facilitating early brain development, and the earlier EUTM ‘POP & VROOM’, owned by SNCF (France’s state-owned rail company).In particular, the… [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm by Wells Bennett
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins released a statement following the completion of yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:29 am
Arnold J kicks off CJEU references in Sky v SkyKick After five days in court and 358 paragraphs, Mr Justice Arnold has just handed down his decision in Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 1:17 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury instructions — Aiding and abetting Richard Brooks and Mark Hatmaker were involved in a conspiracy to illegally purchase prescription pharmaceuticals. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 8:39 am by Lawrence Solum
Frederick Mark Gedicks (Brigham Young University - J. [read post]