Search for: "State v. Mark A. Miller"
Results 241 - 260
of 773
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2015, 9:22 pm
In the 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:59 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice Decision Denying Equitable Tolling of Expired Limitations Period Is Denied Reconsideration Miller v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in the current Section 1981 case Comcast v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:30 pm
It’s U.S. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:05 am
Bartrum, The Curious Case of Legislative Prayer: Town of Greece v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
Hobbs and Miller v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:09 pm
” In Schlage Lock Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Mark Miller urges court-watchers to “focus on the deeper legal questions involved, rather than obsessing over the superficial politics and personalities. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Recent Cases: Miller v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
The trial court ordered the parties to arbitration, appointed Judge Mark Davidson to arbitrate, and stayed the proceedings pending the outcome of the arbitration. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:58 am
Hollingsworth and Mark A. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
The case, Apple v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:55 am
F.F.T., LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:48 am
Wisconsin, Howell v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:25 pm
Upon receiving such a request, the court must " perform the delicate operation of fashioning a response which meaningfully answer[s] the jury's inquiry while at the same time working no prejudice to the defendant' " (People v Brewer, 118 AD3d 1409, 1413 [4th Dept 2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1082 [2014]; see People v Miller, 288 AD2d 698, 700 [3d Dept 2001]). [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
See also, Miller v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 12:42 pm
United States. [read post]
