Search for: "State v. Mark A. Miller"
Results 241 - 260
of 774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
Miller, New York City, for petitioners. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:52 am
Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979) (records of dialed calls); United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
The first is Murphy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
The first was Christie v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:58 am
Prosecutor Mark Miller first questioned Reinecke about his background and experience in forensics, including his work in Kosovo, on the Oklahoma City bombing, and after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
Next, trial counsel Mark Miller examined Olson-Gault on behalf of the prosecution. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Pretrial activities in United States v. al-Nashiri shifted focus Nov. 8 and 10, as the prosecution began presenting witnesses and physical evidence from the USS Cole for preadmission by presiding judge Col. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Military commission proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri continued Nov. 7 with military judge Col. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court granted cert. in Microsoft v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
And they also understand that the state’s ostensible goal—anti-pollution—could be more precisely accomplished by a law that is more directly tailored to the state’s purpose, a ban on littering (as the Court reasoned in Schneider v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
Commentary comes from Brian Miller at Forbes, who calls the grant “good news for public employees who have been fighting for years for the right to decide for themselves whether or not to support a union,” Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, Ross Runkel at his eponymous blog, and Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who observes that a ruling against the union in this case will “mark the end of fair share and the likely demise of public sector… [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 3:07 am
The Kent State tragedy must mark the last time that, as a matter of course, loaded rifles are issued to guardsmen confronting student demonstrators. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:17 am
The Supreme Court stayed the Ninth Circuit’s September 7 decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
Agency v. [read post]
