Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 241 - 260
of 19,458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 2:23 pm
Such findings, as stated above, will be given deference by the courts. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
The CJEU answered the question in the affirmative but the court seized will only have jurisdiction to decide on the damage caused in the territory of the Member State to which it belongs. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
In an interesting decision earlier this year, the General Court upheld the EUIPO Fifth Board of Appeal’s decision regarding a likelihood of confusion between the Bezos Family Foundation’s application for EU trade mark (EUTM) registration of ‘VROOM’, the name of a global programme aimed at facilitating early brain development, and the earlier EUTM ‘POP & VROOM’, owned by SNCF (France’s state-owned rail company).In particular, the… [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:24 am
Evid. 801(c) and 803; Safer, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:34 am
Haley, Judge Richard Mark Gergel held that South Carolina's same-sex marriage bans (by statute and state constitutional amendment) is... [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins released a statement following the completion of yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:39 pm
at 810 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
Ruggers, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal examined in detail the nature and role of survey evidence. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:29 am
Arnold J kicks off CJEU references in Sky v SkyKick After five days in court and 358 paragraphs, Mr Justice Arnold has just handed down his decision in Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 1:17 pm
Criminal procedure — Jury instructions — Aiding and abetting Richard Brooks and Mark Hatmaker were involved in a conspiracy to illegally purchase prescription pharmaceuticals. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 12:01 pm
In Espinoza v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 8:39 am
Frederick Mark Gedicks (Brigham Young University - J. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger stated that the conclusion of the Court of Appeal in Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740 that the 1870 Act did not apply to rent payable in advance, is correct. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm
The opposition relied on Article 8(4) EUTMR, stating that it was entitled under the applicable law in the UK to prevent the use of the mark applied for by means of ‘extended’ passing off (a concept that shall be elaborated on below). [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 6:31 pm
San Diego v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
” United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT MARK S. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
Campbell was understandably unwilling to address the thorny issue of whether use of an EU mark in one member state is enough to establish a reputation in the EU for the purposes of Article 9(2)(b) so simply considered this issue from the point of view of the UK mark. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 11:50 pm
Back then, Poland was not a Member State of the EU (it joined in 2004) and was therefore not bound by EU law. [read post]
