Search for: "State v. McDonnell"
Results 241 - 260
of 524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
Circuit in the Qassim v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:19 am
It places one of the key holdings of Dred Scott v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
Fuentes v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Dacon, 759 F.2d 989].When a Title VII discrimination claim is based on circumstantial evidence, as was here the case, the court said it applied "the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework to determine whether the plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence to survive [a motion for] summary judgment". [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Dacon, 759 F.2d 989].When a Title VII discrimination claim is based on circumstantial evidence, as was here the case, the court said it applied "the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework to determine whether the plaintiff has shown sufficient evidence to survive [a motion for] summary judgment". [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:38 pm
Strobel and State Farm Mut. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
United States, characterizing it as “one of several recent signs that ideology does not always fuel the justices’ decisions. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Fischer v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
Plaintiff is Caucasian and a Canadian citizen with Permanent Resident status in the United States. . . . [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 10:02 am
McDonnell, 299 F.3d 1173, 1181 (10th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 999 (2003). [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 11:44 pm
In a case of first impression from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Doe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 10:56 pm
Michael v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:48 am
Driving on I-95 between the North Carolina state line and Fredericksburg, Virginia may soon cost drivers a toll. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:15 pm
Supreme Court Case of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:25 am
The Court of Appeal disagreed, stating that the important consideration was not the sufficient British connection between the employer and employee for the purposes of employment law, but rather the connection between the co-workers. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:27 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Young v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 12:37 pm
See Holland v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:43 am
The letter also stated that the supervisor failed to get permission to fire her and that she was not in fact terminated. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:00 am
Malveaux In a sea of law review articles analyzing the potential impact of the more rigorous federal pleading standard of Ashcroft v. [read post]
