Search for: "State v. Michael I."
Results 241 - 260
of 6,521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm
Attorney General Michael Mukasey's op-ed "Was Trump 'an Officer of the United States'? [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
[A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new draft article, titled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in the 1868 case of Texas v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 5:33 am
Meanwhile, the rhetoric now features an attempt to re-interpret the Supreme Court’s 2021 Access Copyright v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
Rather than simply re-hash the appellate opinion, I want to draw attention to the successful policyholder’s legal brief, which noted the following: The Flemings’ home was destroyed by Hurricane Michael. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
I have not been able to discover any decided cases on this or similar proposals. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Michael McConnell, Sam Bray, and I recently completed and posted the 2023 online supplement to our constitutional law casebook: The Constitution of the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:00 pm
This is the second of three postings about the empirical studies that Michael Heise and I have conducted on religious liberty decisions in the lower federal courts. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
Delta Air Lines, Zicherman v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm
Michael Liptak (Enviroscience). [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm
Michael Liptak (Enviroscience). [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
Now that everyone (and I mean everyone¹ ) has weighed in on tester standing as presented to the Supreme Court in Acheson Hotels v Laufer I thought I might as well try to explain the issue for those who don’t live and breathe disabilities rights litigation. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am
I understand and share this concern, and I encourage you in your efforts. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:43 pm
I have been greatly blessed over the past couple of decades to collaborate with Michael Heise of Cornell on this work. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
" Defendant argues that Ashcroft v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm
Mardirosian No 07-CR-10075-MLW; Michael Bakwin v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Meadows to the State of Georgia’s Response to his Notice of Removal at 1, State of Georgia v. [read post]
