Search for: "State v. Montes" Results 241 - 260 of 705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2019, 12:32 pm
  The Court stated that a registration statement may be misleading if “it fails entirely to disclose a material risk that is already known by the company” and concluded that it is a reasonable inference that certain defendants “knew of these impending, and imminent material financial events on July 31, 2015. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
Says lawprof Neal Kumar Katyal, who is representing the state of Louisiana as it seeks to reopen the Supreme Court case Kennedy v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Also at On the Docket, Monte Mills writes that although the outcome in Herrera v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
Since 2001 when the Georgia Supreme Court decided State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:51 pm
Nonetheless, the court opined that the argument did not withstand the foregoing logic and the express language of Maryland Rule 2-643 (c) which states, “Upon motion of the judgment debtor, the court may release some or all of the property from a levy if it finds that (1) the judgment has been vacated. . . . [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm by Peter Vickery
As I mentioned on Monte Belmonte's show on the River, although federal law governs the taking itself, state law determines the meaning of "just compensation." [read post]