Search for: "State v. Moon"
Results 241 - 260
of 572
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2016, 3:28 pm
That’s Washington v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
Justice Sotomayor, for example, wrote in her concurrence in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm
In the case of ISIS, it was, somewhat surprisingly, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:33 pm
Read the warning from the State Department here. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 12:21 pm
United States and Jeffries v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 6:43 am
Just last October, in Parent v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
Kermit V. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 3:01 pm
Supreme Court created in its divided Rapanos v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:16 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:37 am
Supreme Court created in its divided Rapanos v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 3:37 pm
Cir. 2003) and Jacobs v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:49 am
Article V of the Outer Space Treaty denotes astronauts as “envoys of humankind”, and creates an obligation to assist the astronauts of another State which crash on one’s own territory or on the high seas; or if a State has astronauts of its own in space who can help the astronauts of another State in space, they must do so. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Wright, After Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:35 am
And if you believe that, I have some real estate on the moon I would like to sell you. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
* Digital files "property", says court in "female patronage" caseFrom Katfriend Ken Moon (IP/IT consultant to AJ Park, Auckland, New Zealand) comes this most helpful analysis of Jonathan Dixon v The Queen [2015] NZSC 147,a New Zealand Supreme Court ruling that goes further than traditional British rulings by analogising digital files to "property". [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
From Katfriend Ken Moon (IP/IT consultant to AJ Park, Auckland, New Zealand) comes this most helpful analysis of Jonathan Dixon v The Queen [2015] NZSC 147, a New Zealand Supreme Court ruling that goes further than traditional British rulings by analogising digital files to "property". [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
In Shapiro v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 4:38 pm
The case, Parent v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 11:41 am
Oct. 19, 2015) (15 plaintiffs from 11 states); DeCrane v. [read post]
